I don't think the intent was to laugh at non-native English speakers,
but rather perhaps the differences between American English vs. British

over the Canadians' "adaptations." (I'm sure there must be SOME). 
--Mark

bru### [at] pingouinrez-gifsupelecfr wrote:
> 
> In article <3c9b0279$1@news.povray.org>, Tom Melly wrote:
> > No - the British would have been "your code, whilst clear in its intent, would
> > not have been parsed correctly due to the rigidity of the parser in such
> > matters, and it's insistence on adhering to the protocols, arbitary as they may
> > be".
> >
> 
> Easy to laugh at non English speakers...
> 
>         -- Bruce (non native English speaker at all)

Post a reply to this message