|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I agree with the majority about the debris. But the main thing, in my eyes,
that makes this obviously fake is the -huge- stream of fire -instantly- erupting
from the explosion. We're talking a brick building here, right? Where on earth
is all that fire coming from? Tone it down to barely there, ie -really- short
flames barely visible, that don't appear instantly, and you've got realism.
-Law
Rune wrote:
> I've been looking at a little reference videos (real life, not holywood) and
> they didn't have neither flashes nor shock waves, so I haven't added that to
> the animation.
>
> I've made the explosion less saturated and made the gravity for the dust
> weaker so it fills a larger volume.
>
> Naturally, feedback is still appreciated, only, I don't go for holywood like
> effects.
>
> Apart from experts like people in these groups, who are trained in noticing
> flaws in CG effects, do you think this animation could fool anyone to think
> it's real?
>
> Rune
> --
> 3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
> Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Feb 16)
> POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
> POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
>
> Name: blow_up_2.mpg
> blow_up_2.mpg Type: Wmplayer File (video/mpg)
> Encoding: x-uuencode
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |