The modelling is great, if you understand modelling as 
creating any object. For me modelling is also creating
a model of something. Hence the question what it is,
just to know what to compare it with. So my verdict:
technical achievement: 9.5 
artistic merit: 7 
conformity to real object: NA
conversation piece: 8.5 

Is that what you wanted to hear? More serious: for some
obscure reason I am interested in working with patches,
their scaling properties, connecting different patches
together, etc. An object like this could be an interesting
object to test what to achieve with patches for me, except
that I do not have a reference, other than your image :)

	Andrel

Shay wrote:
> 
> Clever ideas, guys, but what did you think of the modeling?
> 
> Rick [Kitty5] <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote in message
> news:3c834ea9$1@news.povray.org...

Post a reply to this message