Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> 
> Ok, they are not 100% the same.  But close enough.  The smoothed versions
> should not be that different.
> 
> I made a mistake in my scene.  The height_field had a resolution of 1 less
> than the other version.  I fixed it, and now they *really* have the same
> geometry, as you can see in the first attached image...  But still, the
> smoothed height_field doesn't look as good as it should, as you can see in
> the seconde attached image...
> 

All right, this seems suited for comparison, it's surely worth having a
look at the heightfield normal calculation code.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,                 
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/  
Last updated 21 Feb. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message