Thorsten Froehlich wrote:

> In fact, I think the current implementation is flawed as it ignores everything
> else in POV-Ray.  If catmull-rom splines cannot be added to 3.5 in time the
> whole spline thingy should be dropped as the current implementation would only
> cause needless confusion and conflict with everything else in POV-Ray.

I disagree that it should be dropped. It is still a useful feature even
if it doesn't match the spline type used in the lathe object.

Maybe the spline type used in the lathe object is the one that is flawed.
Anyone think of that?

-- 
Ken Tyler

Post a reply to this message