|
 |
JRG wrote:
> Aah, the golden ratio. I always thought of it just as
> the number to which the ratio between two consequential
> numbers of Fibonacci's series converges...
It all ties together.
How do you find the Fibonacci limit ratio?
You assume that the sequence approaches
... ax^(n-2), ax^(n-1), ax^n ...
and the definition of the sequence gives
ax^n = ax^(n-1) + ax^(n-2) ;
divide through by the last term:
x^2 = x + 1
which is the same quadratic as before.
Or: given a continued fraction form
a[0] + 1/( a[1] + 1/( a[2] + 1/( a[3] + ...)))
you want to find rational approximations. Here's the procedure:
start with num[-2] / den[-2] = 0/1
num[-1] / den[-1] = 1/0
then num[i] = a[i]*num[i-1] + num[i-2]
den[i] = a[i]*den[i-1] + den[i-2]
For tau, 1 + 1/1+(1/1+(1/1+(1/1+(1/1+(...))))),
guess what that gives:
0/1, 1/0, 1/1, 2/1, 3/2, 5/3, 8/5, 13/8 ...
The golden ratio turns up so often, that I was a bit startled one time
when a limit proved to be 6/pi^2 instead!
--
-- Anton Sherwood -- http://www.ogre.nu/ --
"If nobody said anything unless he knew what he was talking about,
a ghastly hush would descend upon the earth." ---Sir Alan Herbert
Post a reply to this message
|
 |