>
> Very nice.
>

Thanks

> Hmm, brass?
>

That'd be it!

>
> The highlights look pretty good imo.
>

Thanks again.

>
> Now, perhaps I'm totally wrong, but I believe that all those settings that Kari and
> others suggested you work best with radiosity (and assumed_gamma 1).
> But have to admit I like the dim lighting of this one.
>

Now I don't get the actual sense of this sentence: should I use
the "settings Kari and others suggested", or should I go for
radiosity (since they didn't mention that)?

Also, something strange occured on my in a test: I had colored
reflections, and then, all of a sudden, the colors wheren't in
shades of <.7,.4,0>^x, but instead also blues (no where's
the blue in <.7,.4,0>?). I do want to look at it more closely,
but since the lightsource has some blue in it, that might be
why...


--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html

Post a reply to this message