|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Thomas Lake wrote:
> I noticed that several people here have remarked that adjusting the contrast
> in pov images, especially ones using Radiosity, can have some dramatic
> results, usually looks much better. Here are some links to images I've done
> in which I've used auto contrast in Photoshop to improve them, the imprved
> images end in CON, what do you think of the changes? Should I make them
> perminent?
>
> http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/Temp/Ball_Maze.jpg
> http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/Temp/Ball_Maze_CON.jpg
The "contrasted" version looks a bit too bright. In this case, I'm not
sure it's a good idea as it brings out artefacts in the focal blur -
especially on the nearest ball.
> http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/Temp/chair_rad.jpg
> http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/Temp/chair_rad_CON.jpg
Nice.
> http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/Temp/house_garage_5.jpg
> http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/Temp/house_garage_5_CON.jpg
Subtle, but better.
> http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/Temp/Radiosity.jpg
> http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/Temp/Radiosity_CON.jpg
Definitely!
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* videotron.ca */}camera{location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a orthographic}
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |