Chris Howie wrote:
> 
> > Am I a complete idiot for using "rotate <0, 360*clock, 0>", or did two
> > people make the same mistake?  Both of these options?  Neither?
> 
> No, you're right.  It escaped me again.  360*clock IS correct.
> 
> Sorry about the error.

Oh, no need to apologize.  Being a rank amateur, I wanted to make sure that
I wasn't  doing something that merely LOOKED like it was working, or
overworking the problem (a major fault of mine), or something along those
lines.

Deaken

Post a reply to this message