bob h wrote:
> 
> "Deaken" <dwy### [at] sw-techcom> wrote in message
> news:3C495FC2.470A0742@sw-tech.com...
> > That's the second time I've seen that particular rotate used in this
> > thread.  Well, the first one was "rotate clock * y".  In neither case was
> > there a Start_ or End_Clock mentioned.
> >
> > Am I a complete idiot for using "rotate <0, 360*clock, 0>", or did two
> > people make the same mistake?  Both of these options?  Neither?
> 
> If you're asking whether or not clock by itself will rotate 360 degrees,
> then no.  Not necessarily anyway, unless you specify a Intitial_Clock=1 and
> Final_Clock=360 for INI file.

Actually, I was asking if my belief (that this was incorrect) was correct.

I think that means the same thing as what you said...

Deaken

Post a reply to this message