|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Not much anymore.
It had spherical/cylinder heightfields and nurbs, focal plane and
a few other things years before POV, also better texture tools
and MUCH better animation support, but now POV has everything
POLY has as far as I know, and then some.
To me POV's renderer always looked a little colorless compared to
POLY and inevitably flattened colors in a way I didn't like and
couldn't fix easily. This seems not be the case anymore, though
it appears that only certain users go for any color intensity
like what I enjoy, so I assume it still takes some tweaking to
bring out vibrant AND rich colors rather than garish/flat colors
which I see so often in renders.
IMO
-peter
"Rick [Kitty5]" wrote:
>
> > > Not everything that POLYRAY allows. For example it will not render to
> > RAW.
> > > I let Alex know that long time ago. I wish the plugin allows for all
> > render
> > > modes that POLYRAU supports.
> > > I am a registered user of POLYRAY and I want RAW back through MORAY :)
> >
> > Just to leave no room for a misunderstanding: Through MORAY using the
> > POLYRAY Plugin.
> > I still have a copy of the latest GUM modeller (from years back) that I
> use
> > only for POLYRAY.
>
> what advantages does polyray have over povray ?
>
> --
>
> Rick
>
> Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
> POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
> TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
>
> PGP Public Key
> http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
--
Current obsession: "Ballet pour ma fille."
http://www.applesnake.net
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |