Michael McKnight wrote:
> 
> Here is my first ever articulated joint.  I don't know if it qualifies as
> inverse kinematics - I use a vector to define the orientation of the moving
> axle.  Toughts?
> 

I think this is a very good demonstration for the fact that this kind of
joint does not lead to constant angular velocities on both sides.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message