bob h wrote:
> 
> The chipped stone looks good.  What occured to me about the vines, or
> vegetation, is that there isn't any thick ground cover on the lowest flat
> areas.  Guess that could be explained by the predominant places for growth
> being only on angled walls.  Would be great if there were a way to get the
> smaller walls to have less greenery and the larger ones more.  Not sure if
> slope texturing can vary in that way.

I don't think that's possible.  Also, to get better contrast between the
vegetation in the high and low flat areas, I had to make the texture
depend to much on elevation and too little on slope, and couldn't get
realistic contrast between the walls and the flat areas.  I decided this
was an okay compromise.

Maybe I could have a look into combining two vine textures, one more
dependent on elevation and one more on slope.

-- 
David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/

Post a reply to this message