Jack wrote:
>
> All the images were assumed_gamma 1.0
Should be no gamma at all.
> (a+b)^c != a^c+b^c ? The math I get, but I don't understand how this
> relates to compositing.
Just try it. Render a two pass scene with two light sources with
assumed_gamma and do a composite. Then render both sources on
with assumed_gamma. The resulting images are not identical.
_____________
Kari Kivisalo
Post a reply to this message
|