Warp wrote:

> Greg M. Johnson <"gregj;-)56590\""@aol.c;-)om> wrote:
> : Distance=0 ought to be allowed, imho, and give  100% color of fog.
>
>   Wouldn't that be in contradiction with the documentation?
>
> "If the intersection depth equals the fog distance the final color consists
> of 64% of the object's color and 36% of the fog's color."

IIMSF,  I have no idea what that sentence is saying, but I can make sense of
the equation.
I think that the proposed change to the equation would give an intuitively
pleasing response to what you'd think of if the "visibility were zero" in a
fog.

Post a reply to this message