Warp wrote:
>
> Try inverting that image (ie. making it negative) with an image editing
> program. Looks almost natural.
>
Yes, indeed.
The reason is probably that the slowest regions are those where most
radiosity samples are not taken from the sky but from the isosurface
itself.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|