POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : tetrahelix (53K) : Re: tetrahelix (53K) Server Time
17 Aug 2024 06:20:42 EDT (-0400)
  Re: tetrahelix (53K)  
From: Dan Johnson
Date: 29 Oct 2001 01:37:55
Message: <3BDCF9A8.4F49A83E@hotmail.com>
David Fontaine wrote:
> 
> > I read that dna twists at exactly the same rate as a
> > tetrahelix, and I think they might look cool together.
> 
> How exactly is that measured, ratio of length of one cycle to the
> radius?
> 
> --
> David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
> My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/

I guess.  I read it in some book from Buckminster Fuller when I was
looking for info on calculating geodesics.  I had to come up with my own
method.  I guess the only place he puts the actual calculations is in
his patents.  I tried to get a copy of his geodesic dome patent from the
patent trademark office web site, but it didn't seem to work.  The way
my dome was calculated it looks ok, but I know that it isn't the
standard method.  All of the struts along an edge of a icosahedron
triangle are the same length in my design.  In no listing of lengths I
have found on the web is this true.  When I find out how Buckminster did
it maybe I will make new versions of my geodesic functions.  
-- 
Dan Johnson 

http://www.geocities.com/zapob


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.