|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
JRG wrote:
>
> Awesome.
> The sky is perfect too.
Thanks.
> I only have to complain of the foregroung, which looks like it needs better
> precision...
As said, the accuracy value should have been lower, but that would have
been even slower of course.
> Several days with your Athlon?! You must be a very patient person.
>
> p.s. Just curious: how much slower the first half was compared to the second
> one?
I can't say precisely since i did not take that much care, but in general
in such scenes the horizon part is quite slow in comparison to the rest.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |