Christoph Hormann wrote:
> 
> I wonder if adaptive accuracy would be useful for isosurfaces.  As visible
> in the near foreground the accuracy value is too high here, but the
> horizon part would look all right with even higher values and would be
> much faster then.  Of course I could try to split it up in several
> objects, but avoiding the gap between is difficult.
> 
> Radiosity quality settings are fairly high (error_bound 0.05) but the
> structures in the shadow could still profit from better settings.

The sky seems unnatural to me, and you're right about the error_bound
and need for accuracy in the foreground, but otherwise this is a great pic.

-Xplo

Post a reply to this message