"Bob H." wrote:
> 
> Wish I had checked the other replies before doing so myself.
> 
> Seems the idea then is for each field to be a independant time-based
> subframe, as per what POV-Ray supposedly does, as I reread that section of
> the doc.
> 
> So... I don't understand what the matter is  :-)

I think he wants each odd and subsequent even frame
to be combined by POV-Ray in a single image. I think
it can be done by any image manipulation program.
But perhaps I am wrong. I have my own idea of how
frames should work, and feel that both the doc and
the implementation are correct (I didn't actually use
it). What's happening, is that POV perhaps isn't doing
things so that importing the result in popular video
software suites is not trivial, but a bit convoluted.

-- 
Adrien Beau   adr### [at] freefr   http://adrien.beau.free.fr/

Post a reply to this message