Thorsten Froehlich wrote:

> > The resulting QT-movie became 128x128 though, so this seems more like a
> > cosmetic problem than a real problem.
>
> This is the correct behavior, and it is identical to the behavior of 3.1.
>
> Of course it would be nice if the image would be centered in such a case,
> but it is so low priority that I never got around to actually implement it.

Ah, sorry. I never noticed it before, and since it looked strange, I thought
that I should report it. But since it's only a minor cosmetic detail, there's
no need to change it.

> >but no QT file at all appeared. I tried several
> > times, but nothing got saved. However, after restarting Pov-ray,
> > everything worked just fine again.
>
> Hmm, was the QT movie still there when you rendered it the second time?  Did
> you accidentally use continue-trace?  What did you do with the first movie
> you rendered?  Move it? Delete it?  Leave it in place?

I didn't make a note about it, and I just got back from a tough one-week gig at
a cruise ship (4 shows a day), so I don't remember the details now. But I think
that I just gave the first QT-file another name, and left it in place. I didn't
use continue-trace. But, since my memory is failing me now, don't take this
info too seriously.

Post a reply to this message