sounds like a typical tactic of the DiVX crew... yuck.
There are just an absurd number of alphas, and betas
out there.
Jetlag wrote:
>
> "Karl Pelzer" <Kar### [at] nospam t-online de> wrote in message
> news:3BA1BC00.B8CBBD77@nospam.t-online.de...
> > Nope!
> >
> > It's all right. I'm not sure how widely the codecs are spread. I've just
> > chosen 4.01 because it is a non-beta version.
>
> "I've also been talking with the developers of DivX4 and it looks as they're
> still heavily working on the codec despite the final stage. ... The final
> release was more a marketing decision than a development decision, as some
> companies do not consider codecs that are labeled beta no matter how good they
> are."
>
> That's a quote from an article on a major divxing site, and its the reason I'm
> reluctant to get the codec just yet.
--
http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad
Why bother? I'm not interesting.
But... maybe "Ballet pour ma fille" will be.
Post a reply to this message
|