|
|
Adrien Beau wrote:
>
> I'm impressed to see lots of people rushing to use ReiserFS
> to store their data, while there still are known bugs into
> it! Using an instable program to do some calculus, or some
> games is fine for me, but storing data unreliably... Wow.
>
Yes, that is over the line for me - even though I otherwise have little
qualms over using beta software, including kernels. If the filesystem is
screwed, I'm screwed (what is that "backup" thing people keep talking
about?)
I did try building kernel 2.4.6 with gcc 3.0 BTW, but the result was
decidedly not stable. Looks like I'll have to switch back to 2.96 for
now; no biggie really, frankly I haven't seen *that* huge performance
leaps from using 3.0
--
Margus Ramst
Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg
Home page http://www.hot.ee/margusrt
Post a reply to this message
|
|