Michael Andrews wrote:
> 
> Mind you, if the 'pigment_pattern' statement makes it into v3.5 it would
> probably be worth removing the convoluted extended syntax from 'slope'.
> You can do exactly the same effects with pigment_pattern and it is as
> easy to understand as the extended slope syntax.
> 
> I only tacked the extended syntax on to Hans Detlev-Fink's original
> slope concept because no-one had implemented anything like the
> pigment_pattern at that time. If we have pigment_pattern to do this (and
> many other clever effects) in v3.5 then the extended slope syntax is
> pointless and should be depreciated.
> 
> It pains me to say this about my only real contribution to The Cause but
> ...

Yes, it's a pitty. Now that I understand everything at last. ;-)

-Hans-

Post a reply to this message