|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
J Charter wrote:
>
> Remarkable! I think the first packs the most punch. The seems wetter if you
> will allow.
Thank you,
watering of the stones still has to be done, but i intent to make them
quite dry in the upper parts.
> While the regularity of the stones dones catch attention in the
> first version, the following versions don't seem to improve much. The real
> strength seems to be in the simple composition and the convincing suggestion
> of texture for the few elements that make up the picture. I think just a
> little more work on the stones would do it. I have one question...would there
> be caustics on the tunnel ceiling?
There are in the second and third one, but they are really hardly
visible. If anyone has suggestions how to improve that...
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |