|
 |
Bill DeWitt wrote:
>
> "Francois Labreque" <fla### [at] videotron ca> wrote :
> >
> > I agree with Tom and you here, it doesn't work very well. maybe if you
> > "reduced" the dimension of the area where this occurs. You might want
> > to take a lookt at some real waterfalls such as:
> >
> > http://falls.net/picttour/pict2/pic9.html
>
> This shows what I was thinking, that his first image was more realistic,
> in that there is no real "sense of speed" at the edges of waterfalls.
Exactly. Water is not viscous enough so that the free-falling water
"drags" the upstream water in. Water at the very top of a water fall
will be flowing at the exact same speed it was 3 miles upstream
(provided the river bed size is constant).
>
> > What? You want US to do YOUR work, now?
>
> Maybe -that- is how he gets them done so quickly!
--
Francois Labreque | And a four year old carelessly banging on a toy
flabreque | piano is not only 'music', it's probably the last
@ | moment of 'artistic purity' they'll ever enjoy
videotron.ca | before outside influences start corrupting their
| expression. - Chris R.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
