Vahur Krouverk wrote:
> 
> "Bob H." wrote:
> >
> > It's a known problem, yes.  I'm not knowledgeable as to why it is though.
> > Something about surface normals inverting and double illuminate maybe?
> > Oh yeah, there was a double illuminate "bug fix" done in version 0.5, I
> > looked it up but that's all I know.
> 
> There was discussion about this, see "Heightfield smooth problem" in
> this group, started 2000-06-13.
> To avoid this, add double_illumination keyword to height field.

It didn't solve it in my case.  I ended up doubling the size of the
.png, moving my hf further away and using distance fog so it doesn't
look jaggy.  

-- 
Francois Labreque | And a four year old carelessly banging on a toy
    flabreque     | piano is not only 'music', it's probably the last
        @         | moment of 'artistic purity' they'll ever enjoy
   videotron.ca   | before outside influences start corrupting their
                  | expression.    - Chris R.

Post a reply to this message