ingo wrote:
> 
> how does the combination object_pattern + blurr_pattern compare to the
> proximity_pattern? Speedwise and for turning an object into pattern
> usable for an isosurface.
> 

That's one of the things i was going to check, but i did not yet have time
to do so.  Anyway right now there are only non adaptive blurring methods
implemented and therefore it is quite slow when using a lot of samples.  

I already started to write a recursive algorithm only taking additional
samples if the values differ, but i did not yet finish it.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message