Chris Huff wrote:
> 
> That would only work for a limited number of isosurfaces...it could
> replace some uses of isosurfaces, but it's an inexact replacement. The
> macros do displacement mapping on specific objects, not an equipotential
> surface. All these macros could do is basic displacements on spheres and
> square patches (eventually discs, cylinders, cones, and torii), but
> isosurfaces can do much more. In addition, a mesh generated with these
> macros will consume much more memory.
> 

I didn't mean to use excatly the same macros, just got the idea from your
pictures.  Maybe i will work it out sometime...

I think i also understand better now how it works, more like a displace
warp for the surface, right?

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message