"Bob H." wrote:
> 
> Ah yes, but in this case it does make a difference.  Seeing this message I
> at first thought the roughness was 0.03308, not 0.3308.  If it were then
> both highlights would have been very similar in both intensity and size.
> This texture actually has a relatively large specular and smaller phong
> highlight.
> I often use the both of them together.  Anyway, I figure you might have also
> thought the two were close in appearance so I wanted to speak up here.
> 

That's what i meant with 'special effects'.  I'm not sure if i leads to
visible results here, brilliance is also quite high giving a third factor
to take into account. 

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message