|
|
My original comment was not claiming this to be a fruad by the way. I
thought it was an excellent image, just to clarify...
ross.
Margus Ramst wrote:
> ddombrow wrote:
>
>> What's the origin of this AWESOME ROLEX thing?
>> For my benefit and the benefit of Patrick, who is probably confused by the
>> reference as well.
>>
>
>
> Someone once posted a picture of a Rolex, claiming it to be a model of his own
> creation, and rendered in POV. Neither of which was true.
> I'll leave it to you to guess the title of that post.
Post a reply to this message
|
|