Warp wrote:
> 
>   I'll save you the trouble of thinking that out:
> 

Thanks.
Funny, now it seems so obvious. But I spent hours scetching cubes and
tetrahedrons in a vain attempt to do a division into 6 parts (the place where I
read about this tessellation method specifically said 6). Finally gave up and
decided the author must've made a typo :)

-- 
Margus Ramst

Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg
Home page http://www.hot.ee/margusrt

Post a reply to this message