Warp wrote:
>
> I'll save you the trouble of thinking that out:
>
Thanks.
Funny, now it seems so obvious. But I spent hours scetching cubes and
tetrahedrons in a vain attempt to do a division into 6 parts (the place where I
read about this tessellation method specifically said 6). Finally gave up and
decided the author must've made a typo :)
--
Margus Ramst
Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peak edu ee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tag povray org
Home page http://www.hot.ee/margusrt
Post a reply to this message
|