Warp wrote:
> 
>   Jerome threw the idea of splitting each sampling cube into 5
> tetrahedrons
> instead of 6 and I liked the idea so much that I tried it.

Hmmm....
When I tried something similar, the only way I could figure out how to split the
cube was into 5 tetrahedrons (4 with faces coinciding with cube faces, 1 "in the
middle"); how did you distribute the 6 ones?

-- 
Margus Ramst

Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg
Home page http://www.hot.ee/margusrt

Post a reply to this message