Warp wrote:
>
> Jerome threw the idea of splitting each sampling cube into 5
> tetrahedrons
> instead of 6 and I liked the idea so much that I tried it.
Hmmm....
When I tried something similar, the only way I could figure out how to split the
cube was into 5 tetrahedrons (4 with faces coinciding with cube faces, 1 "in the
middle"); how did you distribute the 6 ones?
--
Margus Ramst
Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peak edu ee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tag povray org
Home page http://www.hot.ee/margusrt
Post a reply to this message
|