> 
> Let <nx, ny, nz> be the normal of the object before the deformation;
> Let f be the transformation and fx, fy, fz its components;
	Something's not clear here... I should have said that f is the
transform that's applied to the *ray*, it's the inverse of the one
applied to the object.


-- 

* Abandon the search for truth, * mailto:ber### [at] inamecom
* Settle for a good fantasy.    * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
*********************************

Post a reply to this message