That seems more like a problem of deciding whose 'fault' something is, not
exactly an inherent statement about quality.
If someone sent me a letter in Chines I could blame him for making it unreadable
to me or I could blame myself for not being able to read Chines but it says
nothing about the quality of the Chines language or my own language. Or does it?
Let's see, is English a better language then for instance French or Latin? Why
would it be that French or Latin were 'standard' languages sometime among
certain groups of people. Because they were supposed to be better at that time?

Remco

Xplo Eristotle wrote:
> 
> Remco de Korte wrote:
> >
> > I think there is a misunderstanding here. Saying one OS is a standard doesn't
> > imply another to be inferior, does it?
> 
> It does when you have people like Ken saying that if you're not using a
> certain OS, then any compatibility problems you have as the result of
> using a different OS are your fault, not the fault of the person who
> caused you to have compatibility problems.
> 
> -Xplo

Post a reply to this message