Nathan Kopp wrote:
> 
> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote...
> > Nathan Kopp <Nat### [at] koppcom> wrote:
> > : The code for
> > : the post processed focal blur is really quite ad-hoc and not very
> > : scientific.  I made it so that it looked good in my test scenes
> >
> >   Bad, bad! ;)
> 
> I know.  It was actually just a proof-of-concept originally.  But I though
> it looked good enough.

Okay, thanks for the explanation.  No problem :-)  It's just that
I'm writing (from scratch) a POV-Ray documentation in French, and
while writing the "post-process" page, I went crazy doing tests,
trying to get precise results related to the given parameters.
But it works fine enough for common use (blur background).

Fabien.

Post a reply to this message