|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I think I see what you're talking about. The rim is lit more harshly at the
top and top-left and as a result casts a darker shadow. There are six
lights sources around the logo, and the brightest one is causing this.
Unfortunately, that same light is also keeping the plate's surface bumps
from getting washed out. Getting the lighting correct has been the toughest
part of this project because of all the bevels and layers. :-(
Cris
"Christoph Hormann" <Chr### [at] schunter etc tu-bs de> wrote in
message news:39EC7A2A.A7FABF38@schunter.etc.tu-bs.de...
>
>
> Cris Williams wrote:
> >
> > I agree that the letters need shadows. I will add these when I prepare
the
> > image for placement on the web site that it was designed for.
> >
> > You lost me on the other shadow suggestion. The upper left shadow on
which
> > plate, the larger one or the small one? What do you mean by "brighter
> > shadow"? The blue background on the smaller disk is darker at the top
> > because it is a gradient. The smaller disk doesn't cast a shadow
because I
> > think the image is cleaner without it. There are two lights casting
> > shadows, one light is not as bright as the other. I realize the shadows
are
> > kinda harsh, but I think that adds some impact to the logo. Or maybe
not?
> >
>
> Sorry if i was not clear enough, with the dark shadow i meant the shadow
the
> outer rim of the plate is casting on the plate near the word 'wright'.
With the
> lighter shadows i meant the shadows the stuff above the plate is casting
on the
> plate at the opposite side (lower right, near the T of District)
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
> Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |