"Margus Ramst" wrote:
> This method of motion blurring is useful for still images. But IMO it is a
lot
> of wasted effort for animations, where motion exists across frames anyway.

My logic tells me that realistic motion blur never extents that far.
"Overlapping" never occurs. I mean, in the video recorders the light can
only be projected onto one frame at a time. So if you use 25 frames per
second, the motion blur for a given frame will at most range over 1/25
second. Therefore averaging frames will not be realistic.

So if you use realistic settings for the motion blur, MegaPOV's internal
method is always faster (because non-blurred objects are only rendered
once).

Greetings,

Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated October 9)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org

Post a reply to this message