POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : StayHappy : Re: StayHappy Server Time
1 Oct 2024 05:20:46 EDT (-0400)
  Re: StayHappy  
From: Equiprawn
Date: 12 Sep 2000 13:20:16
Message: <39be65d0@news.povray.org>
Hey,

No, MegaPov media. I tried both type 2 and type 3, but the quality of each
in this scene seemed the same, and there was no apparent change in render
time - I stopped each run after 20 hours, and both were only about half way.
Interestingly, both types introduced strange speckles in the clouds (I
didn't try type 1), not like poorly sampled media, but just random lingle
specks here and there.

Equiprawn


Chris Huff <chr### [at] maccom> wrote in message
news:chrishuff-77065F.13014610092000@news.povray.org...
> In article <39bb8cda@news.povray.org>, "Equiprawn" <equ### [at] tinetie>
> wrote:
>
> > Just mucking around with media and heightfields. Render time is terrible
> > though - at 640x480 A0.001, +20 hrs to get to 44 percent.
>
> Official POV media?
>
> This looks like it would be a good use for the object pattern...use the
> object pattern as the density, but use a fast-rendering object like a
> sphere as the container.
>
> --
> Christopher James Huff
> Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
> TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
>
> <><


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.