In article <39bab424@news.povray.org> , Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg>  wrote:

> : No, it is a clear which one is faster, just my notation for the total was
> : incorrect:  See my later posts explaining it in more detail.
>
>   You had another mistake (which I mentioned in another response).
>
>   The total retrieval time in my case is O(n), not O(n*log(n)).

No, it is O(log(n)) for each ++ operator, see my other post!


     Thorsten


____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde

Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org

Post a reply to this message