"ryan constantine" wrote:
> couldn't find where to submit these.

You're not supposed to submit the logos like that. :-)

First narrow the different logos down to one (or a few) logo. Then improve
that logo as much as you can, possible using feedback from the newsgroup.
When you think it can't get any better, then you can submit it by sending it
to me in the formats specified in the rules. You can also make some
presentations of it - for details and inspiration, see the rules and the
already presubmitted logos.

> i'm also posting an example of using some of these images as watermarks.

Please ask yourself if it was necessary to post such a big image just to
show the logos as watermarks.

And now to the feedback...

Logo 2 and logo 4 seems to be the same logo, just with different effects.
So does logo 7 and 8.

Among the logos you posted, logo 2/4 and logo 7/8 are my favorites.

I think logo 7/8 is a bit too detailed. Logos generally shouldn't be too
detailed. Of course logo 6 is much worse, but that wasn't one of my
favorites anyway. :-)

Logo 2/4 is nice and simple, but it also looks a bit unoriginal. The "P" is
for "POV-Ray", but anything else about it than that?

Suggestions for improvement - hmm, all the logos seem to fit nicely into a
square making them look a bit boring. Try tilting or sharing the various
shapes to make the logos appear more interesting!

Anyway, you seem to be able to come up with a lot of ideas - keep trying,
and the perfect logo just might present itself for you! :-)

Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated July 23)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org

Post a reply to this message