"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:39ad1856@news.povray.org...
> Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote:
> : Ah, what the hell - let's go the MS route and call it a "feature".
>
>   It's not that the limitation is there because people are too lazy to fix
it.
> You have to understand how the post-processing works in order to
understand
> why there is this kind of limitation and why it's just too difficult to
> overcome.
>

Oh, I wasn't disagreeing - in fact once you see it happen, even without
knowing the inner workings of post-processing, you slap your forhead and say
"of course" (and then thank the Gods, or Nathan, that the non-PP image is
kept as well, and then wonder how you are going to fill in all the detail
you missed out on the basis that focal blur would hide your sins).

Post a reply to this message