Bill DeWitt wrote:
> 
>     I like to think that -anything- can be done with isosurface if one can
> figure out the formula. I cannot figure out anything but the basics, and
> some random thrashing around with those. But I am still struggling with an
> isosurface tree. So far I haven't even been able to reach my first goal, a
> "Y"...

:-)

I just wrote some thoughts i had, maybe i will try it out myself sometime, it
should really be more simple than a realistic tree ...

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message