BigCeef wrote:
> 
> Ok. Not a fascinating image, but my first play with motion blur. I'm really
> pleased. It's part of a 50 frame anim which I've yet to render... and at 50
> mins per frame on my p200, I'm not looking forward to it... hehe
> 

This method of motion blurring is useful for still images. But IMO it is a lot
of wasted effort for animations, where motion exists across frames anyway.
Here, a much more practical solution is to render the frames without motion
blur, and then average a number of consecutive frames together to get the
blurring. One utility that can do this is Warp's Targa averager:
http://www.students.tut.fi/~warp/PovUtils/average/

-- 
Margus Ramst

Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message