|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Anton Sherwood wrote:
>
> Christoph Hormann wrote:
> > BTW, you should consider using jpg for posting pictures here, downloading 600k
> > can be really boring and you could easily compress this pict. to below 100k.
>
> the .bmp is 481078 bytes;
> .jpg at 100% is 141264 bytes;
> at 80% it's 51653 bytes;
> at "0%", below, 10921 bytes.
>
Yeah, although your "0%" seems beyond optimum. BTW, the .bmp was more than 600k
due to encoding.
To make it complete, reduced to 4 colors and saved as png i achieved 8348 bytes
and it looks much better than your jpg...
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |