Anton Sherwood wrote:
> 
> Christoph Hormann wrote:
> > BTW, you should consider using jpg for posting pictures here, downloading 600k
> > can be really boring and you could easily compress this pict. to below 100k.
> 
>     the .bmp is 481078 bytes;
> .jpg at 100% is 141264 bytes;
>      at 80% it's 51653 bytes;
>  at "0%", below, 10921 bytes.
> 

Yeah, although your "0%" seems beyond optimum.  BTW, the .bmp was more than 600k
due to encoding.  

To make it complete, reduced to 4 colors and saved as png i achieved 8348 bytes
and it looks much better than your jpg...

Christoph

--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message