Gilles Tran wrote:
> 
> Does it mean that a good strategy when rendering a large radiosity image likely to
> cause "out of memory" problems is to render it in a batch ?
> +ER300 +C
> +ER600 +C
> +ER900 +C
> etc.
> 
> Each successive partial render picks up the image where the previous one left it
> (solution not tested ?).
> 
	No because in that case, either you didn't save the radiosity data and
you'll see it in the final image, or this data will be reloaded each
time and the last render will use as much memory as the whole would
have...


-- 

* Doctor Jekyll had something * mailto:ber### [at] inamecom
* to Hyde...                  * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
*******************************

Post a reply to this message