Vahur Krouverk wrote:
> 
> I wonder, why this clamping reduces performance in such degree (almost
> 50 %)? Noise calculation does much more and requires only twice as much
> time? This seems really strange.
	I guess it's because it requires computing three modulus on doubles
which is very slow (a division + a floor + a difference)*3 whereas noise
itself mostly requires some additions and substractions (all right plus
a few multiplications, but not that many and no division)


-- 

* Doctor Jekyll had something * mailto:ber### [at] inamecom
* to Hyde...                  * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
*******************************

Post a reply to this message