Kari Kivisalo wrote:
> 
> I have a theory on why these changes were necessary to produce more
> pleasing image than the "scientific settings".
> 
[...]

Sounds reasonable (although i *try* to judge realism from comparing to reality
and not to photos). What we should not forget is, that the "scientific settings"
are only a simplified mathematical model for reality, that maybe produces good
results in many cases but that is far from being perfect.  

Christoph

--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message