Bill DeWitt wrote:
> 
>     Only problem is that although this looks good, it's not right. The
> individual items are orbiting at arbitrary rates, rather than the
> proportionally correct rates.
> 

If it's meant to be stars rotating in a galaxy, the function for rotation speed
is quite complicated and based on the mass distribution in the galaxy.  It is
not linear of quadratic, etc. in any way.

NTL, it looks good.

Christoph

--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message