POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : is radiosity (MP) really necessary? [tot~80KB Jpg] : Re: is radiosity (MP) really necessary? [tot~80KB Jpg] Server Time
1 Oct 2024 07:21:45 EDT (-0400)
  Re: is radiosity (MP) really necessary? [tot~80KB Jpg]  
From: Christoph Hormann
Date: 5 Sep 2000 10:30:34
Message: <39B503C1.71426150@schunter.etc.tu-bs.de>
Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
> #if (Use_MP & Rad = yes)
>  ambient_light <.1,.05,.025>
[...]
> #else
>  ambient_light <1,1.025,1.05>*.75
> #end

That's probably the reason for the missing additional blue in the radiosity
version.  

For the rest: I think the balconies look much better in the radiosity version,
because it generates some structures in the shadows, while the conventional
lighting only shows the plain ambient. 

Christoph 

--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.